The Supreme Court striking down a piece of federal legislation would be in line with: A. an attitudinalist approach
B. literalist readings
C. judicial activism
D. judicial restraint
The Supreme Court striking down a piece of federal legislation would be in line with:
Share
The correct answer is C. judicial activism.
Judicial activism refers to the practice of judges making rulings based on their personal views or the needs of society, often leading to the overturning of legislation. When the Supreme Court strikes down a piece of federal legislation, it typically reflects a willingness to interpret the Constitution in ways that can expand or protect rights, which aligns with the principles of judicial activism.
If you have more questions or need further clarification, feel free to ask!