Reese says that both red lines are lines of symmetry. Is she correct? Why or why not?
No, because the halves do not match when the figure is folded along either line.
Yes, because both lines go through the center of the figure.
Yes, because a figure can have two lines of symmetry.
No, because neither line goes through a vertex.
Reese says that both red lines are lines of symmetry. Is she correct? Why or why not?
Share
To determine whether Reese is correct about the red lines being lines of symmetry, we need to understand the definition of lines of symmetry. A line of symmetry divides a figure into two identical halves that are mirror images of each other.
If Reese claims that both red lines are lines of symmetry but only one line allows the figure to be folded into matching halves, then she is incorrect. The correct answer would be:
No, because the halves do not match when the figure is folded along either line.
This means that neither line creates identical halves, confirming that they are not lines of symmetry. If you have any other questions or need clarification on this topic, feel free to ask!
Reese is correct: Yes, because a figure can have two lines of symmetry. A shape can have multiple lines of symmetry as long as each line divides the shape into two identical halves. If both red lines pass through the center and create mirrored halves, then they are considered lines of symmetry.