Pluto was discovered in 1930. The IAU scientists gave themselves tasks to determine the three main qualifications and the definition of Pluto. 1. Who are the stakeholders involved in this discovery? A. Scientists B. ...
Quizzma Latest Questions
In 2006, the International Astronomical Union (IAU) made a decision regarding Pluto’s status. What was the decision? A) Pluto is a planet B) Pluto is no longer considered a planet C) Pluto is a dwarf planet D) Pluto remains in ...
who was involved? A. The International Astronomical Union B. NASA C. A team of astronomers D. Planetary scientists what happened? A. Pluto was reclassified B. Pluto was discovered C. A new planet was found D. Pluto became a star ...
Before 2006, people were certain of the fact that there were nine planets in the solar system, from Mercury all the way to Pluto. However, in 2006, a team of scientists known as the International Astronomical Union (IAU) met in ...
Pluto: The Former Planet? A team of scientists in Prague made an important decision that Pluto should not be considered a planet. What is it? Where did it happen? When did it happen? How did it happen or how are ...
Pluto was discovered in 1930. The IAU scientists gave themselves tasks to determine the three main qualifications and the definition of Pluto. When it was decided that Pluto should not be considered a planet, a team of scientists met in ...
Pluto: The Former Planet? A. The international B. Astronomical Union C. A team of D. Scientists met E. In Prague, Czech F. Republic G. 2006
Drag and drop each item in the correct sequence to illustrate a solar eclipse. Moon Sun Earth
In general, how does the size and location of a star’s habitable zone depend on the star’s mass?
Which of the following is not considered a potential solution to the question of why we lack any evidence of a galactic civilization?
A___ stands out in a photo of a galaxy because it shines brightly with light from massive young stars and glowing clouds of gas and dust
Scientists think it is very unlikely that complex and large forms of life could evolve on planets that orbit stars that are much more massive than the Sun. Why?
Overall, does the nebular theory seem adequate for describing the origins of other planetary systems?
How can scientists account for the fact that extrasolar planets seem to come in a wider range of types than the planets of our solar system?
What is planetary migration, and how may it account for the surprising orbits of many extrasolar planets?
Directly detecting an Earth-size planet around one of the nearest stars (besides the Sun) is roughly equivalent to trying to take a picture of a ball point from a pen at a distance of about ________ kilometers.
Using the example of Earth, we can make arguments both in favor and against the likelihood of intelligence arising on a planet with life. Which of the following tends to suggest that intelligence might be relatively uncommon?