Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
One reason some argue that campaign financing should be restricted is because
supporting a candidate is considered free speech.
the Constitution limits the influence of citizens on elections.
limitations help to ensure the wealthy are less influential.
restrictions allow for greater influence by fewer corporations.
The correct answer is: limitations help to ensure the wealthy are less influential.
Explanation: Advocates for restricting campaign financing argue that without limitations, wealthy individuals and corporations can have an outsized influence on elections and political outcomes. By enforcing financing limits, it is believed that the playing field is leveled, allowing candidates from diverse backgrounds to compete more fairly and ensuring that all citizens have a voice in the political process, not just those with substantial financial resources.