Two interest groups are competing for influence in Congress. One group represents banking institutions, while the other advocates for consumer protections. A critic of the influence of interest groups would make which of the following claims?
- The interest groups will nominate a slate of candidates for office to compete against each other in the next election in order to determine which interests prevail.
- The consumer protection group will appeal only to Republican leaders, while the banking interests will appeal only to Democratic leaders.
- The banking interest group likely has greater financial resources and access to policy makers than the consumer protection group.
- The consumer protection group is prohibited by federal regulations from direct lobbying.
The correct answer is 3. The banking interest group likely has greater financial resources and access to policymakers than the consumer protection group.
This claim reflects a common critique of the influence of interest groups, which is that well-funded and wealthy interest groups representing powerful industries or corporations often have an advantage in lobbying and influencing policymakers compared to public interest groups representing consumers or the general public.
Here’s a breakdown of the other options:
The critique suggested in option 3 is that due to their greater financial resources and connections, interest groups representing powerful corporate or industry interests often have more access and influence over policymakers compared to public interest groups with more limited means. This imbalance of influence is a major criticism of the role of interest groups in the political process.
The banking interest group likely has greater financial resources and access to policy makers than the consumer protection group.