Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
The author explains that many of the U.S. Supreme Court judges were in favor of slavery. This gives you the idea that the
A) Scotts may not have gotten a fair trial.
B) judges were not considered citizens.
C) Scotts had already been given their freedom.
D) judges were in favor of banning slavery.
The correct answer is A) Scotts may not have gotten a fair trial.
Explanation: If many U.S. Supreme Court judges were in favor of slavery, this suggests that the legal environment and the biases of those judges could have influenced their decisions against the Scotts in a way that compromised their right to a fair trial. In such a context, the judges’ preferences could have affected the outcome of cases involving slavery.