Select the statement(s) that accurately explain why the mayor used science to help make this policy.
The scientific data used to make the policy can be trusted.
The data pointed to the community being negatively affected after the ban.
The data on single use plastics showed that there is a negative impact on the community.
The scientific evidence did not show a benefit to the community. The mayor decided to make the policy anyway.
The scientific evidence showed that banning the plastics would benefit the local community.
The statements that accurately explain why the mayor used science to help make this policy are:
1. The data pointed to the community being negatively affected after the ban.
2. The data on single-use plastics showed that there is a negative impact on the community.
3. The scientific evidence showed that banning the plastics would benefit the local community.
Explanation: The mayor likely used scientific data to inform the decision-making process, focusing on the potential impacts of single-use plastics on the community. By emphasizing that the data indicated both negative effects and potential benefits of banning these plastics, the mayor could justify the policy on sound scientific grounds. This approach builds trust and confidence in the decision.
If you need more in-depth assistance or further clarification, feel free to check the extended services page!