Based on this selection, which statement shows an argument against active SETI?
A. Until scientists prove that other planets can support human life, space exploration is useless.
B. Without knowing what space creatures would be like, calling attention to life on Earth is unwise.
C. Scientists do not have the advanced technology they need to explore the solar system.
D. Sending powerful radio waves into distant space may be harming life on other planets.
The correct answer is B. Without knowing what space creatures would be like, calling attention to life on Earth is unwise.
This statement presents an argument against active SETI (Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence) by highlighting the potential risks of attracting unknown extraterrestrial life forms to Earth. It suggests that without understanding the nature of these entities, it may be dangerous to broadcast signals into space that could reveal our location.
If you have more questions or need further clarification, feel free to ask!