Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
∠1 and the 50° angle are adjacent.
m∠1 = 180° – 50°
m∠1 = 50° because ∠1 and the 50° angle are vertical angles.
m∠2 = 135° because ∠2 and the 45° angle are supplementary.
m∠2 cannot be determined from the information given.
m∠2 = 180° – 50° – 45°
To find the correct values of the angles, let’s clarify the information:
1. If ∠1 and the 50° angle are adjacent, ∠1 is not a vertical angle to the 50°. Instead, adjacent angles share a common vertex and side but do not overlap.
2. Given the equation m∠1 = 180° – 50°, you correctly find that m∠1 = 130° because adjacent angles sum to 180°.
3. For m∠2 = 135° because it’s said to be supplementary to the 45° angle; that’s not accurate unless there’s clarity that implies m∠2 + 45° = 180°.
4. The claim m∠2 = 180° – 50° – 45° involves determining a specific geometric configuration, which will be context-dependent.
To summarize the correct answers, we can say:
– m∠1 = 130° (adjacent to the 50° angle).
– m∠2 can only be determined if we know the relation to other angles explicitly stated.
Thus, the answer to your question is that m∠2 cannot be determined without additional information defining its relationship clearly to other angles.