Which describes a difference in the rule of Constantine and Diocletian?
O Constantine appeased foreign invaders by giving them land, while Diocletian went on the offensive to stop the attacks.
O Constantine divided the empire into western and eastern halves, while Diocletian further split the country into four regions.
O Constantine divided the empire and shared emperor duties, while Diocletian reunited the empire and served as sole ruler.
O Constantine reunited the empire and served as sole ruler, while Diocletian divided the empire and shared emperor duties.
Difference in the rule of Constantine and Diocletian
Share
The correct answer is: O Constantine divided the empire into western and eastern halves, while Diocletian further split the country into four regions.
Explanation: Diocletian established the Tetrarchy around 293 AD, dividing the empire into four regions, each governed by a co-emperor to maintain order and manage the vast territory. Meanwhile, Constantine later consolidated the empire into two main halves (Eastern and Western) and is known for his efforts to reunify and stabilize it, but his division was not as extensive as Diocletian’s.